Suppelemental Figure 3: Impact of multiple-imaged plankton

To assess the impact of duplicate images, for all casts in AE1912, the most abundant plankton taxonomic groups (Rhizaria, Trichodesmium, Copepods, Eumalacostraca) were all identified as either an independent observation or a “technically not duplicate” - a multiple instance of the same individual recorded in multiple pictures.

The abundance of these taxa were then calculated with two possible methods: 1- All technically not duplicate images were counted as independed observations. Density was then calculated using the volume sampled as determined by the UVP 2- Technically not duplicate images were removed. When

Method 1 is displayed by black points while Method 2 is displayed by blue points.

Registered S3 methods overwritten by 'ggalt':
  method                  from   
  grid.draw.absoluteGrob  ggplot2
  grobHeight.absoluteGrob ggplot2
  grobWidth.absoluteGrob  ggplot2
  grobX.absoluteGrob      ggplot2
  grobY.absoluteGrob      ggplot2

Code

print(dup_plots)

$gf360c5_Chaetognatha

Sup Fig 3. Imact of multiple-imaged organisms on density estimates for specific taxa on individual casts in 20m bins. Black points show inclusion of multiples, blue points show exclusion.


$gf360c5_Copepoda


$gf360c5_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c5_Rhizaria


$gf360c5_Trichodesmium


$gf360c6_Chaetognatha


$gf360c6_Copepoda


$gf360c6_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c6_Rhizaria


$gf360c6_Trichodesmium


$gf360c7_Chaetognatha


$gf360c7_Copepoda


$gf360c7_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c7_Rhizaria


$gf360c7_Trichodesmium


$gf360c8_Chaetognatha


$gf360c8_Copepoda


$gf360c8_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c8_Rhizaria


$gf360c8_Trichodesmium


$gf360c9_Chaetognatha


$gf360c9_Copepoda


$gf360c9_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c9_Rhizaria


$gf360c9_Trichodesmium


$gf360c10_Chaetognatha


$gf360c10_Copepoda


$gf360c10_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c10_Rhizaria


$gf360c10_Trichodesmium


$gf360c11_Chaetognatha


$gf360c11_Copepoda


$gf360c11_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c11_Rhizaria


$gf360c11_Trichodesmium


$gf360c13_Chaetognatha


$gf360c13_Copepoda


$gf360c13_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c13_Rhizaria


$gf360c13_Trichodesmium


$gf360c14_Chaetognatha


$gf360c14_Copepoda


$gf360c14_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c14_Rhizaria


$gf360c14_Trichodesmium


$gf360c15_Chaetognatha


$gf360c15_Copepoda


$gf360c15_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c15_Rhizaria


$gf360c15_Trichodesmium


$gf360c16_Chaetognatha


$gf360c16_Copepoda


$gf360c16_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c16_Rhizaria


$gf360c16_Trichodesmium


$gf360c17_Chaetognatha


$gf360c17_Copepoda


$gf360c17_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c17_Rhizaria


$gf360c17_Trichodesmium


$gf360c18_Chaetognatha


$gf360c18_Copepoda


$gf360c18_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c18_Rhizaria


$gf360c18_Trichodesmium


$gf360c19_Chaetognatha


$gf360c19_Copepoda


$gf360c19_Eumalacostraca


$gf360c19_Rhizaria


$gf360c19_Trichodesmium

---
title: 'Suppelemental Figure 3: Impact of multiple-imaged plankton'
---

To assess the impact of duplicate images, for all casts in AE1912, the most abundant plankton taxonomic groups (Rhizaria, *Trichodesmium*, Copepods, *Eumalacostraca*) were all identified as either an independent observation or a "technically not duplicate" - a multiple instance of the same individual recorded in multiple pictures.

The abundance of these taxa were then calculated with two possible methods:
1- All technically not duplicate images were counted as independed observations. Density was then calculated using the volume sampled as determined by the UVP
2- Technically not duplicate images were removed. When 

Method 1 is displayed by black points while Method 2 is displayed by blue points.

```{r set up, warning = F, echo=FALSE}
rm(list = ls())
library(ggplot2)
library(ggalt)
dup_plots <- readRDS('../Output/supp_fig_03_dup-plots.rds')
```

```{r plots, warning = F, fig.cap='Sup Fig 3. Imact of multiple-imaged organisms on density estimates for specific taxa on individual casts in 20m bins. Black points show inclusion of multiples, blue points show exclusion.'}
print(dup_plots)
```